Please answer ASAP

. An 80 year old accountant created a contract with a local university. The contract stated that upon the accountant's death, his estate would fund two scholarships/ bursaries. In return the university would follow his "unique" guidelines for the recipient: . The first award/ bursary must go to a male, Caucasian, single, heterosexual student studying accounting. He must stay single throughout the year, must not play inter-collegiate sports, and should do some kind of manual labour in the summer months. . The second awards must go to a hard-working, single Caucasian white girl who is not feminist or lesbian, also studying accounting. She also must stay single and must not play inter-collegiate sports. . The contract (scholarship) was challenged. The court ruled that the above scholarship "contract" should not be enforceable. . From what you know about the 3 elements that will determine whether a contract is enforceable, on what grounds do you think the court made this ruling? (Another way to ask this: which of the 3 elements made this contract not enforceable?) For the toolbar, press ALT+F10 (PC) or ALT+FN+F10 (Mac). BIUS Paragraph Arial 14px V IE v A 2 V H Q Copy E E X2 X2 - + ABC V V A X EXE EX T () KY +