please answer these two question

state the rule and apply thr rule to the fact given

is a controversy or dispute, decide who wins and give the legal reason for your answer. Where appropriate, state the RULE and APPLY THE RULE to the facts given. Explain your answers fully. If there is a controversy or dispute, decide who wins and give the legal reason for your answer. Where appropriate, state the RULE and APPLY THE RULE to the facts given. Explain your answers fully. 1. Nicole purchases a used car from Guiffre Motors. She asked the seller if the car had ever been in an accident. The salesperson had never seen the car before that day and knew nothing of its history. Nevertheless, the salesperson told Nicole, "No, it has never been in an accident." In fact, the car had been seriously damaged in an accident and had been repaired. When Nicole found out that the car had been damaged and repaired, she calculated that the car was worth $1,000 less than she paid for it. She sued Guiffre Motors for fraud and Guiffre Motors defended by saying that the salesperson didn't know the cars history and therefore didn't intend to deceive Nicole. Evaluate Nicole's claim, discussing all of the including all of the elements of fraud. 2. Paul said to Jim, "I'll give you $100 for your watch." Jim replied, "I'II take $135." Paul said, "No, thanks." Jim then said that he accepted Paul's offer of $100. Paul said that he was no longer interested and that there was no contract. Jim insists that there is. Decide who is right and explain why. Be sure to discuss the elements of a contract and whether this interaction satisfies those elements.