Please answer this question in as much detail and explanation as possible.

Please use the images below as a guide as well as the reference link provided below.

Reference Link:

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title19.2/chapter15/section19.2-264.4/

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/304/

1.Based on the facts, testimony, and evidence presented in the Atkins case study which, if any, of the aggravating circumstances identified in the Virginia law do you believe apply in the Atkins case?Why do these aggravating circumstances from the Virginia law apply to this case?If you believe none of the aggravating circumstances identified in the Virginia law apply, why do none of the circumstances apply to this case?

2.Based on the facts, testimony, and evidence presented in the Atkins case study which, if any, of the statutory mitigating circumstances identified in the Virginia law do you believe apply to this case?

3.Why do these statutory mitigating circumstances from the Virginia law apply to this case?If you believe none of the statutory mitigating circumstances identified in the Virginia law apply, why do none of the circumstances apply to this case?