please follow the Moral Challenge Action Plan(below) to identify and evaluate the moral communities and wisdom traditions involved in the case. What is their stake in the case? How would you define their influence on the social conscience of Wells Fargo as an organization? What is their influence on other individual stakeholders? How do the competing moral communities or wisdom traditions compare in their interpretation and practice of the basic moral orientations?

Limit your submission to no more than 600 words.

\fEthical Your interpretation of the values conflict or moral challenge. Analysis . What is the main moral issue in this case? What is at stake? What is the moral urgency? (Uncertainty, risk, danger) Who is the key moral actor in this case? Whose actions and decisions determine the moral resolution of this case? What is your intuitive moral judgment of the issue? What foundational moral values are involved? (CARE, LIBERTY, FAIRNESS, LOYALTY, AUTHORITY, SANCTITY) How do values and moral judgments conflict? Is it a right/right or right/wrong conflict? What type of right/right? Is the moral issue with an action, the means of action, or the intent of an action? What normative moral claims and standpoints of VIRTUE (character, common good), DUTY (principle, moral claims), and CONSEQUENCES (outcomes, harm, cost, benefit) should you consider in evaluating the moral challenge? How would you apply the values and code of your wisdom tradition to understand and explain the moral issue? How does the moral challenge align/conflict with the core values of your Wisdom Tradition and that of stakeholders? Stakeholder Your interpretation of stakeholder interests in light of precedents, context, and evidence: Analysis . Who are the stakeholders (Individuals, groups, or entities) whose values, moral claims, and duties constitute the moral challenge of the case? What values, Wisdom Traditions, and moral arguments support their claims? How valid and sound are those claims? . What competing or contested values, claims, or duties complicate this case? Which stakeholders have more urgent and compelling claims? Why? . What similar cases or situations are useful as analogues for evaluating this case? Option Your interpretation of options. What are the feasible options for the key moral actor to Analysis consider in resolving the moral problem? On what grounds are they morally justified? Decision Your action recommendation. Which option is the most ethical, and on what grounds? How does the action express/reflect your core values? Summary Your argument in brief: Can you explain the best decision option or action plan Argument persuasively in