Please I need help with this, be original please no copy and paste! Thanks in advance.

Ch1) "Suppose that the California legislature passes a law that severely restricts carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles in that state. A group of automobile manufacturers files suit against the state of California to prevent the enforcement of the law. The automakers claim that a federal law already sets fuel economy standards nationwide and that fuel economy standards are essentially the same as carbon dioxide emission standards. According to the automobile manufacturers, it is unfair to allow California to impose more stringent regulations than those set by the federal law. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions."

1.Who are the parties (the plaintiffs and the defendant) in this lawsuit?

2.Are the plaintiffs seeking a legal remedy or an equitable remedy?

Ch2) "A state legislature enacted a statute that required any motorcycle operator or passenger on the state's highways to wear a protective helmet. Jim Alderman, a licensed motorcycle operator, sued the state to block enforcement of the law. Alderman asserted that the statute violated the equal protection clause because it placed requirements on motorcyclists that were not imposed on other motorists. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions."

2.What are the three levels of scrutiny that the courts use in determining whether a law violates the equal protection clause?

3.Which standard of scrutiny, or test, would apply to this situation? Why?

4.Applying this standard, is the helmet statute constitutional? Why or why not?