**PLEASE SET-UP THE ANSWER SIMILAR TO HOW I HAVE SETUP THE QUESTION**

I THANK YOU VERY MUCH IN ADVANCE :)

Question 1:

Harry and Wilma were divorced in 2008, and Harry was ordered in the divorce decree to pay his ex-wife $10,000. In 2009 and 2010, Harry was hospitalized, incurring $3,000 in bills. He and Wilma discussed the matter, and Wilma agreed to pay the bill with her own money, even though Harry still owed her $5,000 from the divorce decree. When Harry died in late 2010, Wilma made a claim against his estate for $8,000 (the $3,000 in medical bills and the $5,000 from the decree), but the estate was only willing to pay the $5,000 from the decree, claiming she had paid the hospital bill voluntarily and had no contract for repayment. Is the estate correct? Explain.

• The case is determined using IRAC. The matter of the case is as follows:
  1. The issue is:
  2. The rule of law for this case is:
  3. An analysis of the case:
     • The facts of the case are:
  4. A conclusion of the case states:
     • Based on the facts of the case -

Question 2:

Louie, an adult, entered into a contract to sell a case of scotch whiskey to Leroy, a minor. Is the contract void or voidable? Explain.

• The case is determined using IRAC. The matter of the case is as follows:
  1. The issue is:
  2. The rule of law for this case is:
  3. An analysis of the case:
     • The facts of the case are:
  4. A conclusion of the case states:
     • Based on the facts of the case -

Question 3:

James Mann owned a manufacturing plant that assembled cell phones. A CPA audit determined that several phones were missing. Theft by one or more of the workers was suspected. Accordingly, under Mann's instructions, the following sign was placed in the employees' cafeteria:

*Reward* We are missing phones. I want all employees to watch for thievery. A reward of $500 will be paid

for information given by any employee that leads to the apprehension of employee thieves.

James Mann

Waldo, a plant employee, read the notice and immediately called Mann, stating, "I accept your offer. I promise to watch other employees and provide you with the requested information." Has a contract been formed? Explain.

• The case is determined using IRAC. The matter of the case is as follows

1. The issue is:
2. The rule of law for
3. An analysis of the case:
   • The facts of the case are:
4. A conclusion of the case states:
   • Based on the facts of the case -