Please watch the films "Gone Baby Gone".

apply Kant's moral philosophy to judge the MAIN FINAL action. For "Gone Baby Gone" judge Patrick's final decision.

You must apply Kant's 3 premises (In the case of " Gone Baby Gone" the philosophical process you will follow in this paper should sound as something like this:

According to Kant's first premise Patrick behaved morally because he returned the victim he was hired to find and without condition this is the "right" conduct for any detective in cases of kidnapping (the "First Maxim"). Here Kant speaks of doing the right prior to good.

2. On Kant's second premise Patrick acted morally because he respected the dignity of Amanda and he treated her as an end in herself and not as means to an end like everyone else was doing in the film (the "Second Maxim"). Here Kant speaks of humans as special creatures and ends in themselves. Humans are ends, not means to an end.Los seres humanos son un fin, no un medio para un fin.

3. The conclusion is that a detective acts morally when he reports a kidnapping to the police and this behavior should establish a universal law governing all detectives in cases of kidnapping (the "Third Maxim"). Here Kant asks us to test the universality of our action. Will it be OK if everyone does what I am about to do?) for 50 points and Kant's 3 contrasts (Watch Lecture by Professor Michael Sandel: Mind your Motive inside Week 6 Folder) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rv-4aUbZxQ&themeRefresh=1 for 50 points.

analyze Patrick's final action comparing it with the Kant's premises and explained his motivation or any other contrast prof. sander talks about. Was his actions moral or immoral based on Kan's categorical imperative?

Thank you!