Problem-based question. Hi, could anyone please help me with this?
I currently have identified the issues of: ambiguous term, Parol Evidence Rule, Signature rule (Toll v Alphapharm), Inclusion of price rule (Mushroom Composters) and potentially unilateral mistake and damages but am not if they are correct. Could someone help with the analysis for this question? Thank you so much!
- (should be about 1500 words maximum not including footnotes and bibliography)
- I couldn't upload the pdf version. For some reason the textbox wouldn't accept it.
The Australian Guide to Legal Citation , 4 th Edition ( AGLC ) is to be used for referencing in this assignment . This style is the standard in the Australian legal profession and relies upon footnotes instead of in- text references . Students should note that a separate bibliography is required in this assignment in accordance with AGLC guidelines . Failure to submit a separate bibliography will result in a penalty being applied to your assignment . Some resources which will help you with understanding the AGLC are listed as follows :" Referencing and Citation Styles ( University of Sydney Library ) http: / / lib guides . library . usyd . edu . au / content . php ? pid = 160012 & sid = 1513 435) Australian Guide to Legal Citation , 4 th Edition ( University of Melbourne ) https : / / law . unimelb . edu . au / mulr / aglc / about Learning to use the AGLC referencing style will be a primary focus of the Library Workshops .Assignment problem question: Alpha is the owner of an equipment installation company. In May, Piggy, a meat market owner, called Alpha and asked whether Alpha could install six used coolers that Piggy had recently purchased. The coolers were to be installed in a new meat market that Piggy was opening. Piggy emphasized the need to complete the installation by January 22, in time for the new market's grand opening on that day for the Australia Day holiday on January 26. On January 2, Alpha met with Piggy, and after a brief discussion Piggy signed a form entitled \"Authorization Agreement." The document provided that: \"In consideration of $12,000 to be paid on completion of the work, Alpha will install in Piggy's meat market six used coolers, including pressurizing all cooling lines and calibrating the equipment for proper temperature within 20 days from the making of this contract." Alpha told Piggy that he would sign the Agreement and send it back to Piggy as soon as Alpha had verified that he had the necessary compatible fittings for the valves on the used coolers. On January 5, having verified that the compatible equipment was on hand, Alpha dated, signed, and sent back to Piggy the Authorization Agreement. Alpha's crew began installing the equipment on Monday, January 17, and by Friday, January 21, had installed five of the six coolers with pressurization and calibration complete. The crew chief informed Piggy that he and his crew would be back on Monday, January 24, to finish up the installation. Piggy became enraged and told the crew chief that she specifically told Alpha that installation would have to be completed by January 22 and that Alpha would be in breach of contract if the chief and his crew waited until Monday to finish up the job. The crew chief phoned Alpha and informed him of the situation. Alpha, in turn, phoned you, his lawyer, informed you of all of the above facts, and asked whether he is contractually obligated to complete the installation by January 22 (which means that he will have to pay his crew overtime pay for working on a Saturday), or can they complete the installation on Monday l[January 24}. Advise the parties on contract law issues only arising from the above. (20 marks) 5 marks will be allocated for structure, evidence of research, expression, spelling/grammar and correct referencing for a mark out of a total of 25 marks
