QUESTION 1 (5 Marks) If you were to investigate the matter presented in the case study, indicate how you would go about it. Formulate a problem statement, the main aim of your study, and TWO (2) objectives. Substantiate these elements with evidence from the case. QUESTION 2 (20 Marks) Based on your response to Question 1, explain in full, the methodological sleps that you would implement to investigate the situation that you have highlighted. Remember to justify your response. QUESTION 3 (10 Marks) In doing data collection, describe at least five (5) important issues that you would consider to ensure that you do not violate the participants in any way. QUESTION 4 (5 Marks) Based on the scenario given in the case study above, what advice or recommendations would you give to the management of KPMG to restore the preferred stuation? Substantiate your reasoning. SECTION B [60 MARKS] Answer ALL questions in this Section QUESTION 5 (30 Marks) Qualitative and quartitative studies derive from contrasting ontological and theoretical assumptions, as well as research designs. In view of this, and, in your cwn wcrds, make a comparison of these two approaches in the context of the followirg: a) The conception of reality (6 marks) b) The goal or objective of the research (5 marks) c) The forms of reasoning (4 marks) d) The research design, the role of the researcher, meaning determination, data collecion and interpretation. (15 marks)