Question
QUESTION 1 In February 2012, the Australian Accounting Standards Boards decided at its meeting to propose the withdrawal of AASB 1031 Materiality. There were several
QUESTION 1
In February 2012, the Australian Accounting Standards Boards decided at its meeting to propose the
withdrawal of
AASB 1031 Materiality.
There were several reasons for this proposal which includes: there is
no International Reporting Standard equivalent and it does not look like there will be, since 2005 there has
been the gradual withdrawal of additional Australian guidance from a number of Australian Accounting
Standards, and there is now an updated guidance on materiality in the
IASB Conceptual Framework
.
The major impact of the withdrawal of
AASB 1031
is the removal of the specific quantitative guidance for
materiality. The withdrawal of
AASB 1031
became effective to annual reporting beginning on or after 1 July
2015.
REQUIRED:
1.
Summarize the significant changes with
AASB 1031 Materiality
(issued by the Australian
Accounting Standards Boards - AASB) from 1995 to 2015. (8 Marks)
2.
Prior
to the withdrawal of
AASB 1031
and with reference to the
AASB 1031 Materiality
(issued by the
Australian Accounting Standards Boards - AASB) and the
ASA 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing
an Audit
and
ASA 450 Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during an Audit
(
issued by the Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board - AUASB), (12 Marks):
a.
Define materiality.
b.
Outline the qualitative and quantitative guidelines of materiality.
c.
How the concepts and constructs of "materiality" influence the auditors' professional
judgment on misstatements.
3.
Post
withdrawal of
AASB 1031
, would this harmonise/bring uniformity to auditors' assessment of
materiality misstatements or would this bring disparity to auditors' assessment of misstatements? What
other influence this would bring to the auditors' judgment on misstatements? Discuss your answer and
rationale. (Support your answers with the relevant Australian Accounting Standards and Australian
Auditing Standards as well as published Peer-reviewed Academic Journals and Articles.) (10 Marks)
NOTE
: In answering Question 1, use Harvard referencing style and support your answers with relevant
accounting and auditing standards as well as published peer-reviewed academic journals. A minimum of 5
peer-reviewed academic journals is expected. (Hint: this is a great opportunity to utilise the University's Library
Services online such as Library Search, Advance Search, eJournals and Databases such as EBSCOhost, etc.)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started