Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Question 18 In the Bradford v. Snyder 2015 ABQB 406 (CanLll) decision, the trial judge held: Not yet answered Select one: Marked out of O

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
Question 18 In the Bradford v. Snyder 2015 ABQB 406 (CanLll) decision, the trial judge held: Not yet answered Select one: Marked out of O a. The Plaintiff must bear greater responsibility because she failed to stop at a red light. 1.00 Flag O b. The proper approach to apportion liability is the comparative blameworthiness approach. question O c. The evidence of the two accident reconstruction experts was not credible and had to be completely disregarded. O d. Playground zones exist to protect children and not to indicate that motorists should be on the lookout for increased traffic, particularly of the non-motor vehicle kind. Question 19 Search for the decision of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta in GAP Mining Supply Inc. v. 0865970 Not yet BC Ltd., 2016 ABQB 698. All of the following statements are true, except one. Choose the exception. answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. One of the witnesses who testified at the trial was an expert witness, qualified as an expert in P Flag accounting and the rules that apply to that profession. question O b. The trial judge ruled in favour of the Plaintiffs and awarded them $500,000 in damages as compensation for their losses. O c. The trial judge characterized the failure of Mr. Herbert and Mr. Briere, to keep notes of any of their discussions with clients/investors, as evidence of sloppiness. O d. The trial judge accepted Mr. Herbert's evidence that he properly disclosed his and Mr. Briere's interest in the investment.Question 20 Based on the decision in GAP Mining Supply Inc. v. 0865970 BC Ltd., which of the following Not yet statements is FALSE? answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. One of the cases relied on by the Plaintiffs' counsel, was a case from the Supreme Court of Canada Flag which describes the conceptual approach to fiduciary duties as a three step analysis. The name of that question Supreme Court of Canada case is Hodgkinson v. Simms. O b. The trial judge held that the evidence did not support the Plaintiffs' claim of a breach of duty or duties on the part of the Defendants. O c. At the time of trial, Mr. Herbert was what was then called a Chartered Accountant, who had practiced in partnership with Mr. Briere, for two years. d. One of the cases relied upon by the Defendants' counsel, was a case from the Alberta Court of Appeal, known as Financial Management Inc. v. Planidin, which includes criteria regarding the creation of an ad hoc fiduciary relationship

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Elliott And Quinns Tort Law

Authors: Frances Quinn

12th Edition

1292251441, 978-1292251448

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions