Question 25 0.5 / 0.5 pts Roger owns a failing business. Year after year, his business has been losing tens of thousands of dollars. There is a very small probability that his business will turn around and succeed. However, Roger continues to stay in the business simply because he's been running it for a long time, and doesn't want to feel like he's wasted the last few years of his life. This scenario illustrates which of the following logical fallacy? Sunk cost fallacy Correlation proves causation Post hoc ergo propter hoc Fallacy of composition Quiz Score: 11 out of 1 DEC at tv 6