Question The state of New Tudor passes a law making it illegal to destroy one's driver's license, because the state does not want to have to spend the resources to make new ones. Bart, in order to protest the 65 MPH speed limit, burns his license in front of a crowd and says, "If I can't drive more than 65, I might as well not drive!!" to the applause of the crowd. Bart is punished for burning his license with a $100 fine. At trial, he shows that he is the only person to have ever been prosecuted under this statute. He proves that he was targeted because he burned the license to protest and claims that this violated his freedom of expression. Is he correct? Why or why not?