Read Labor Law Case 7 at the end of Chapter 8 and answer the four questions, which I paraphrase below: 1. Does the childcare center's plan to replace striking employees by inverse seniority (i.e. least senior return first) violate the NLRA, or is it allowable because of the Mackay doctrine? 2. If the strike replacement plan was in fact determined an unfair labor practice, would that make the strike an unfair labor practice strike? 3. Were the strikers entitled to be reinstated on July 25 th? Does it matter whether the strike was an unfair labor. practice strike? 4. During the hearing for this case, the company said the rationale for the inverse-seniority reinstatement was financial because more senior employees cost more money. It was not clear if this was discussed at the June 27 th bargaining session or only brought up later in the hearings. Why does it matter whether the cost-savings rationale was provided during the June 27 th bargaining session? axcxbelond 300 Digging Deeper Why Dos Strikes Dccur? A Mullidisciplinary Revearch Ouestion