Read the Leadership in Extreme Contexts: A Groupthink Analysis of the May 1996 Mount Everest Disaster article and other resources assigned in Week 4 for the Groupthink Paper.

Consider the questions below as you read the article. They will help you think about the basic facts and context of the case, as well as the consequences of groupthink. You will need to provide a brief summary of the basic facts of the case in your Groupthink Paper and these questions may serve as a guide:

• What was the Everest Disaster of May 1996?
• Who is Hall and how many people are on Hall's team?
• Who is Fisher and how many people are on his team?
• What are the conditions the team is working under?
• Are there extra pressures from the environment? If so, what were they?
• Why did Neal, Andy, Anatoli, Jon, Klev, and Martin make the summit and the remaining expedition members did not?
• How many groups were stranded and lost sight of their camp? Why did this happen?
• Did Hall's and Fischer's teams fall behind because of a lack of skills?

after reading the case study above you can respond to theses questions below

• What is groupthink?
• Why is groupthink dangerous?
• Was the outcome the result of collaborative actions of individuals? Explain your answer.
• Why is cohesion the first and most critical catalyst of groupthink?
• How would the leadership style encourage groupthink?
• What is conformity? What is deviance?
• Why would conformity and/or deviance matter to the group?
• What did the article mean by collective rationalization and ingroup-outgroup biases?

Review your findings and make detailed recommendations on what strategies leaders and groups can put into action to avoid groupthink

can you add your references too