Review the data of Case 16 "The Investment Detective". Utilize various methods to determine the ranking of the projects based on the cash flows provided. Be certain to use NPV and IRR calculations in your analysis. Then, complete the same analysis with a higher discount rate using the same evaluation methods.
Why do the rankings become more stable and similar between the 2 methods with a higher discount rate? Explain with example from your work.
Page 239 CASE 16 The Investment Detective The essence of capital budgeting and resource allocation is a search for good investments in which to place the firm's capital. The process can be simple when viewed in purely mechanical terms, but a number of subtle issues can obscure the best investment choices. The capital-budgeting analyst, therefore, is necessarily a detective who must winnow bad evidence from good. Much of the challenge is in knowing what quantitative analysis to generate in the first place capital-budgeting analyst for a company considering investments in the eight projects listed in Exhibit 16.1. The CFO of your Suppose you are a new company has asked you to rank the projects and recommend the "four best" that the company should accept EXHIBIT 16.1| Projects Free Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) 6 8 Project number Initial investment 1 2 4 5 7 $(2,000) $12,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $12,000) $(2,000) $ 350) (60) 60 $1,666 334 $ 280 $ 2.200 $1,200 Yoar $330 $160 2 330 200 280 900 3 330 165 350 280 300 4 330 395 280 90 350 330 432 280 70 700 6 330 440* 280 1,200 $2,250 330 442 280 280 $1,000 444 446 280 10 448 280 11 450 280 12 451 280 13 451 280 14 452 280 $10,000 15 $2,000) 280 Sum of cash flow benefits Excess of cash flow over initial investmont $3,310 $2,165 $10,000 $3.561 $4,200 $2,200 $ 2,560 $4,150 S 165 $ 1.561 $ 200 $1,310 8,000 $2.200 $ 560 S2.150 "Indicates year in which payback was accomplished. In this assignment, only the quantitative considerations are relevant. No other project characteristics are deciding factors in the selection, except that management has determined that projects 7 and 8 are mutually exclusive. All the projects require the same initial investment, $2 million. Moreover, all are believed to be of the same risk class. The firm's weighted average cost of capital has never been estimated. In the past, analysts have simply assumed that 10% was an appropriate discount rate (although certain officers of the company have recently asserted that the discount rate should be much higher). To timulate your analysis, consider the following questions: 1. Can you rank the projects simply by inspecting the cash flow? 2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why? 3. What is the ranking you found by using quantitative methods? Does this ranking differ from the ranking obtained by simple inspection of the cash flows? 4. What kinds of real investment projects have cash flows similar to those in Exhibit 16.1? Page 239 CASE 16 The Investment Detective The essence of capital budgeting and resource allocation is a search for good investments in which to place the firm's capital. The process can be simple when viewed in purely mechanical terms, but a number of subtle issues can obscure the best investment choices. The capital-budgeting analyst, therefore, is necessarily a detective who must winnow bad evidence from good. Much of the challenge is in knowing what quantitative analysis to generate in the first place capital-budgeting analyst for a company considering investments in the eight projects listed in Exhibit 16.1. The CFO of your Suppose you are a new company has asked you to rank the projects and recommend the "four best" that the company should accept EXHIBIT 16.1| Projects Free Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) 6 8 Project number Initial investment 1 2 4 5 7 $(2,000) $12,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $(2,000) $12,000) $(2,000) $ 350) (60) 60 $1,666 334 $ 280 $ 2.200 $1,200 Yoar $330 $160 2 330 200 280 900 3 330 165 350 280 300 4 330 395 280 90 350 330 432 280 70 700 6 330 440* 280 1,200 $2,250 330 442 280 280 $1,000 444 446 280 10 448 280 11 450 280 12 451 280 13 451 280 14 452 280 $10,000 15 $2,000) 280 Sum of cash flow benefits Excess of cash flow over initial investmont $3,310 $2,165 $10,000 $3.561 $4,200 $2,200 $ 2,560 $4,150 S 165 $ 1.561 $ 200 $1,310 8,000 $2.200 $ 560 S2.150 "Indicates year in which payback was accomplished. In this assignment, only the quantitative considerations are relevant. No other project characteristics are deciding factors in the selection, except that management has determined that projects 7 and 8 are mutually exclusive. All the projects require the same initial investment, $2 million. Moreover, all are believed to be of the same risk class. The firm's weighted average cost of capital has never been estimated. In the past, analysts have simply assumed that 10% was an appropriate discount rate (although certain officers of the company have recently asserted that the discount rate should be much higher). To timulate your analysis, consider the following questions: 1. Can you rank the projects simply by inspecting the cash flow? 2. What criteria might you use to rank the projects? Which quantitative ranking methods are better? Why? 3. What is the ranking you found by using quantitative methods? Does this ranking differ from the ranking obtained by simple inspection of the cash flows? 4. What kinds of real investment projects have cash flows similar to those in Exhibit 16.1
