Rosenbloom's approach, which introduces the "hard look" and "soft look," appears to be fairly sensible. The idea of the "hard look" emphasizes the importance of a thorough evaluation of key factors, ensuring that decision-makers conduct thorough investigations. This method encourages accuracy, minimizing errors in administrative judgments by requiring a careful examination of facts and potential repercussions. In contrast, the "soft look" offers a degree of flexibility, realizing that not every circumstance necessitates a thorough examination. This adaptability enables a more pragmatic judgment in situations where a thorough examination may be unnecessary, helping to the efficiency of administrative operations. The interaction of the "hard look" with the "soft look" recognizes the dynamic character of administrative operations, where a uniform strategy may not be appropriate. This dual framework equips decision-makers with the tools they need to customize their examination to the specific circumstances of each case. It represents a pragmatic knowledge that certain situations necessitate a more thorough study, whereas others benefit from a more speedy evaluation. The "hard look" and "soft look" constitute a balanced and adaptive strategy that allows administrators to negotiate the complexities of decision-making with both thoroughness and efficiency