SB (Irresponsible Teen] Rose is 17... [Irresponsible Teen] Rose is 17 in a state where the age of majority is 18. She purchased a prom dress from Your Special Day. She wore it to the prom and then attempted to return it to the store, claiming that she was a minor and that she was entitled to a refund. The dress had clearly been worn and had a purple stain which Rose claimed was from grape juice. Additionally, a few days before she turned 18, Rose purchased a used car from Salls Car Savings. She had a deal whereby she paid $100 per month on the car. She drove the car and made payments for six months after she turned 18. Rose then returned the car to Sal's Car Savings, Informed the owner that she was under 18 when she entered into the contract to purchase the car, and told the owner that she was returning the car for a full refund. Sal's Car Savings claimed the car was a necessary. Rose and her parents disagreed claiming that the parents were ready and willing to provide a car to Rose, and that she only purchased the car from Sal's Car Savings because she liked that particular style and color. When purchases of the dress and car were made, the sellers knew that Rose was under the age of 18, MC Qu. 16-58 Which statement applies in the dispute between... Which statement applies in the dispute between Rose and Sal's Car Savings, considering that she waited to turn 18 before attempting to disaffirm the contract? Which statement applies in the dispute between Rose and Sal's Car Savings, considering that she waited to turn 18 before attempting to disahem the contract? Multiple Choice Solongos, after reaching the age of majority, Rose did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract, then she did not commit an express ratification Rose was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to t. An impled ratification occurs when parents agree to accept the debt entered into by a minot: if Rose caused any damage whatsoever to the car, she was said to have impliedly ratified the contract Rose was required to expressly satily the contract before she could be bound to its long as nodamage was done, but she did any damage to the coas a matter of low, she is said to have impliedy ratified it