Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Scope and format: This is an individual report. The word limit is 2,500 words Students should format the report using the recommended report structure given
Scope and format: This is an individual report. The word limit is 2,500 words Students should format the report using the recommended report structure given below. APA 7 referencing is required throughout. Look to the Marking Schedule for further guidance on how marks are allocated. Write a report on a local business in New Zealand, evaluating the applicability of three different sustainability models. Recommend one sustainability programme that could lead to the achievement of competitive advantage for the business. The report must include at least one Maori / Iwi sustainability model and demonstrate how the sustainability programme will impact the business operations and management as well as the community and physical environments in which the business operates. Report Format The report should be structured using the following format: Cover Page Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Introduction
- The objectives of the report
- The methodology used to write the report
- The structure of the report
- Any limitations of the report
- Organisational Background
- Sustainability Model 1
- Sustainability Model 2
- Sustainability Model 3
- Sustainability programme
- Impact analysis
Contents | Allocated marks |
Executive Summary
| (10 marks) |
Introduction
| (5 marks) |
Organisational background
| (5 marks) |
Evaluation of model - 1
| (10 marks) |
Evaluation of model - 2
| (10 marks) |
Evaluation of model - 3
| (10 marks) |
Sustainability programme
| (10 marks) |
Impact analysis
| (20 marks) |
Format and presentation Structure and format [*Mechanics - Spelling, punctuation, grammar, referencing and formatting]
| (5 marks) |
Referencing and research Referencing style (APA Version 7) Evidence of research conducted is of sufficient depth and detail
| (10 marks) |
In class participation
| (5 marks) |
TOTAL | (100 marks) |
A Grade Description (80% 100%) | B Grade Description (65% - 79%) | C Grade Description (50% - 64%) | D Grade Description (0% - 49%) | |
Criterion One: Ideas and understanding | Excels in responding to assessment tasks Interesting; demonstrates the development of complex ideas Appropriately limits and defines terms. Central ideas are clearly and succinctly communicated Understands and critically evaluates supporting evidence /reference material | A sound course, responding to assessment tasks Attempts to define terms, but not always successful Clearly states central ideas, but may have minor lapses in development Begins to acknowledge the complexity of central ideas and the possibility of other points of view Shows careful reading of supporting evidence/ reference material but may not evaluate them critically | Adequate, but less effective response to assessment tasks Presents central ideas in general terms, occasionally depending on generalisations and/or dictionary definitions Limited exploration of other points of view Shows basic comprehension of supporting evidence /reference material with occasional lapses in understanding | Does not respond appropriately to the assessment task Lacks central ideas Supporting evidence /reference material misunderstood or inadequate Ineffective development of ideas Assessment too brief |
Criterion Two: Supporting Evidence | Uses citations appropriately and effectively, providing sufficient evidence Explanations supported and justified convincingly | Support points using a range of relevant citations Begins to interpret and justify the evidence, explaining connections between evidence and main ideas | Generalizations sometimes used to support points Sometimes depends on unsupported evidence or personal experience Occasionally assumes that evidence speaks for itself and needs no application to the point being discussed Occasional lapses in logic | Uses irrelevant or inadequate supporting evidence /reference material throughout Supporting evidence /reference material consistently not acknowledged |
Criterion Three: Organisation and coherence | Uses logical structure appropriate to assessment tasks Transitional sentences often develop and link ideas and identify their logical relations Paragraphs have topic sentences guiding the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas | Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses transitional sentences Some logical links may be faulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to central ideas | Occasionally lists ideas arranged randomly (rather than using any evident logical structure) While each paragraph may relate to central idea, logic is not always clear Arrangement of sentences within paragraphs may occasionally lack coherence | Lacks organisation, and paragraph coherence and uses few or inappropriate transitional sentences Paragraphs lack topic main ideas and may not all relate to assessment tasks |
Criterion Four: Style | Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses discipline-appropriate language Writing style fits assessment task Sentences are varied, yet clearly structured, focused, and succinct | Generally, uses words and discipline-appropriate language accurately and effectively Sentences are generally clear, well-structured, and focused, though some sentences may be awkward or ineffective | Occasionally uses relatively vague and simple words May use some non-academic language occasionally Sentence structure generally correct, but sentences may occasionally be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing | Too vague and abstract Overall, contains awkward or grammatically incorrect sentences Majority of sentence structure is too simple with use of non-academic language |
Criterion Five: Mechanics (Spelling, punctuation, grammar) | Almost entirely free of mechanical errors | May contain mechanical errors, which may distract the reader but not impede understanding | Contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding | Contains many mechanical errors that block the readers understanding and ability to see connections between ideas |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started