See the attached document and answer the following questions.

1. What is the common law rule governing accommodations of guests?
2. Whatdoestheopinionsayaboutdistinguishinga"boarder"froma"guest"?
3. Under what circumstances may exemplary damages be assessed against an innkeeper who refuses accommodations?

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California. PERRINE et al. V. PAULOS et al. Civ. 17627. Nov. 29, 1950. Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1950. Hearing Denied Jan. 25, 1951. Action by Bonnie Perrine and Ruth Taylor against Fred Paulos, Selma Younis, and others, for unlawful eviction. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, LeRoy Dawson, J., entered judgment for plaintiffs and denied defendants' motion for new trial, and defendants appealed. The District Court of Appeal, Drapeau, J., held that the evidence did not establish any excuse or justification by defendants in their treatment of plaintiffs, and that plaintiffs were entitled to exemplary as well as general damages. Judgment affirmed, and appeal from order denying motion for new trial dismissed. West Headnotes [1] KeyCite Notes 213 Innkeepers 213k9 k. Duty to Furnish Accommodations. Most Cited Cases Complaint by hotel guests alleging that defendants were owners of hotel, that guests were tenants on a weekly basis, and that guests were unlawfully evicted from their rooms, stated a cause of action predicated on the duty of an innkeeper to his guests. KC [2] KeyCite Notes 213 Innkeepers 213k9 k. Duty to Furnish Accommodations. Most Cited Cases In guests' action against hotel owners, evidence supported finding that hotel manager had authority to evict guests, and supported judgment against hotel owners.[3] KeyCite Notes 30 Appeal and Error