Silda, a Michigan resident, is suing the city council of Detroit, Michigan for $70.000, claiming that under the federal Civil Rights Act they discriminate against her business on gender-based grounds. Detroit officials are claiming the federal court should not have jurisdiction over the cased and have motion to dismiss for lack of federal court jurisdiction. Their theory is that since a state citizen is suing a state entity, the case belongs in state court. For which of the following reasons is Detroit correct? Muitple Choice The amount in controversy is less than the $75,000 minimum required for federal court jurisdiction. Gidda is not a citizen of estate different from the defendant, they ate both from Michigan, thus diversity of citizenship, a requirement of federal court Jurisdiction, is not present. Gilda has not alieged a vislation of her rights under the U.S. Consvitution, which is the only way she could file in federal court. Delroit is correct for all of the above stated reasons