Speaking to the case study below as the basis of analysis, please leverage the example of a project of building a pool in the backyard of a home to justify why it's going to be beneficial or recommended. Focus on the part of the process that will bring the best benefits. What tools could be used to make analyzing the root cause easier? What quality tools should be applied to improvement initiative?

Additional info:

Project to explain: Building a swimming pool in the backyard of a home

1. Include Significant Benefits: (Where the process will impact the outcomes and favorability)

2. Include the "what" benefits (3 benefits):

3. What Analysis tools to identify the root causes: (Address the 5 whys in the root cause analysis)

4. Include what problem solving tools, the reason for tools selection and include specific tools that can be applied to the improvement initiative going forward.

Process Improvement Case Study: Designing for Innovation Current State: An organization realized that opportunities for innovation were typically discovered during the production phase, but this is when it is more expensive to implement changes. Further, beyond a suggestion box, the organization realized it did not have a transparent corporatewide innovation vetting process. The leadership decided to set up an innovation team to identify and develop an innovation process. The team started by developing a series of owcharts of how innovation currently was handled in each of the organization's major business units. They then focused on understanding the voids that existed and envisioned what a centralized strategic innovation process would look like. Future State: The team advocated for formalizing the innovation process in each of its major business units' operational processes rather than an afterthought at the production phase. The business unit processes would be like what Toyota implemented whereby workers at different phases of the production process are empowered to stop production, x issues, perform routine maintenance, and take steps to improve the processes. The team then developed a centralized corporate innovation process for vetting strategic initiatives considered beyond the scope of individual business units and included representatives from each business unit. Ianact: The streamlined innovation process provided transparency, had shorter chains of command, clearer roles and responsibilities, and most importantly allocated resources and timelines for innovation before and during pre-production. Staff could simultaneously focus on production as well as innovation that allows for iterative design and feedback. The centralized innovation process served as a coordinating and communication mechanism as well as a forum for vetting strategic corporate opportunities