Question
1. Suppose that a country has two sectors, food and clothing. Labor is mobile between sectors, but capital and land are not. Capital is specific
1. Suppose that a country has two sectors, food and clothing. Labor is mobile between sectors, but capital and land are not. Capital is “specific” (i.e., only used) to make clothing. Land is specific to make food. If trade liberalization would result in the country exporting food, would the capital holders prefer autarky or free trade? Why?
2. Markovia and Pokolistan only trade with each other. Both countries grow potatoes and make steel. Potato production is relatively labor intensive. Steel production is relatively capital intensive. Markovia is relatively capital abundant. Pokolistan is relatively labor abundant.
a) According to the Heckscher-Ohlin model, what product would Markovia export? Why?
b) According to the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, if Markovia put a tariff on potatoes, what would be the impact on the wage-to-rent ratio (W/R) in both countries? Why?
Step by Step Solution
3.33 Rating (153 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Solution Result in the 1 If a country how two sectens food and clo...Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started