Taxes are a cost, and, therefore, changes in tax rates can affect consumer prices, project lives, and the value of existing firms. The following problem illustrates this. It also illustrates that tax changes that appear to be good for business do not always increase the value of existing firms. Indeed, unless new investment incentives increase consumer demand, they can work only by rendering existing equipment obsolete.

The manufacture of bucolic acid is a competitive business. Demand is steadily expanding, and new plants are constantly being opened. Expected cash flows from an investment in a new plant are as follows:

		0	1	2	3
1.	Initial investment	101
2.	Revenues		101.00	101.00	101.00
3.	Cash operating costs		51.00	51.00	51.00
4.	Tax depreciation		33.67	33.67	33.67
5.	Income pretax		16.33	16.33	16.33
6.	Tax at 35%		5.72	5.72	5.72
7.	Net income		10.62	10.62	10.62
8.	After-tax salvage				16.90
9.	Cash flow (7 + 8 + 4 1)	101	44.28	44.28	61.18
NPV at 19% = 0

Assumptions:

Tax depreciation is straight-line over three years.

Pretax salvage value is 26 in year 3 and 51 if the asset is scrapped in year 2.

Tax on salvage value is 35% of the difference between salvage value and depreciated investment.

The cost of capital is 19%.

(Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)

a. What are the values of a one- and two-year-old plant? b. Existing plans must continue using the original tax depreciation schedule. What are the values of a one- and two-year-old plant? c. Calculate the net-of-tax salvage value of a two-year-old plant. d. Assume the corporate income tax was abolished entirely. What are the values of a one- and two-year-old plant?