Temporary status Application Refusal.

This discussion is about the criteria used by officers when refusing temporary status application. There could be many different reasons behind their beliefs that applicant may not be eligible for a visa. These reasons typically revolve around concerns regarding the applicant's intentions and ability to comply with visa conditions. Here are the 3 reasons why an officer may refuse a temporary status application.

Applicant's Lack of Travel History :

An Applicants' lack of international travel history may raise concerns about their eligibility for visa approval. Refusal based on travel history can be the reason. When an applicant has not been outside of their home country previously or has travelled outside their country but not very often. Applicant's criminal history should be clean any bad record can affect his case.Temporary status application should provide IRCC with a detailed explanation of this travel history.

Personal financial status.

If an applicant's financial status is insufficient to support themselves during their stay in Canada, the officer may refuse the application. This reason shows that applicant may engage in unauthorized work during his stay to support themselves. It is extremely important to prove that you have the enough funds to pay all the expenses of travel.

Applicant has a family member in Canada.

If applicant has family member in Canada this reason could influence an officer's decision . This reason shows applicant may overstay in Canada or may not wish to return back . For example if the applicant is applying to visit his wife in Canada and all his family lives in home country so this situation could create doubts and his visa can be refused.

It is important to note that each application is assessed on a case-by-case basis. And officers consider various factors when making decision. Applicants who have been refused temporary status visa may have the opportunity to address any concerns raised by the officer and provide additional information or documentation to support their application.

Should be well structured, properly written, critical analysis of one peers' posts. Should develop peers' ideas, add constructive comments on peers' posts, and write between300 and 500 words. Should includeat least one reference. Please do not write "I agree" or "I disagree" or "The post is well written, I will just add". Explain your critical point of view. When writing posts, you should not simply copy and paste content from the peer's posts or from other sources without a proper acknowledgment of the authorship whileadding personal, critical contributions or developments to the topic.