The defendant's employees had been working in a manhole. They left the cover off the manhole...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The defendant's employees had been working in a manhole. They left the cover off the manhole when they went for lunch. They also left a paraffin lamp nearby. A young boy crawled down the manhole with the lamp. He was badly burned when the lamp fell and exploded. The explosion occurred because vapours escaped from the lamp and were ignited by the flame. The court held that the series of events was entirely unforeseeable. It nevertheless imposed liability because the type of injury that the plaintiff suffered, a burn, was reasonably foreseeable. It did not matter that the source of that burn was a bizarre accident rather than direct contact with the lamp's flame, as might have been expected. The remoteness principle is used to resolve thin skull cases. A thin skull case occurs if the plaintiff was unusually vulnerable to injury. In a literal example, suppose I am injury-prone because my skull is very thin. If you carelessly hit me on the head with a stick, are you responsible for all of my losses? What if a normal person would not have suffered any injury? What if a normal person would have suffered a minor injury, but not one as serious as mine? The law tries to strike a balance between its desire to compensate me and its desire to treat you fairly. You are not responsible at all if a normal person would not have suffered any harm. But you are fully responsible for all of my losses if it was reasonably foreseeable that a normal person would have suffered some damage. 381 For instance, if your carelessness would have bruised a normal person, I can fully recover for the fact that I also suffered brain damage. 382 Significantly for business people, the courts traditionally refused to apply a thin wallet principle. The defendant was not responsible for the fact that the plaintiff suffered to an unusual extent because the victim was poor. Today, however, the courts will hold the defendant fully liable if it was reasonably foreseeable that the plaintiff's poverty would cause it to suffer more than usual. 383 Business Decision 6.2 explores those issues. The defendant's employees had been working in a manhole. They left the cover off the manhole when they went for lunch. They also left a paraffin lamp nearby. A young boy crawled down the manhole with the lamp. He was badly burned when the lamp fell and exploded. The explosion occurred because vapours escaped from the lamp and were ignited by the flame. The court held that the series of events was entirely unforeseeable. It nevertheless imposed liability because the type of injury that the plaintiff suffered, a burn, was reasonably foreseeable. It did not matter that the source of that burn was a bizarre accident rather than direct contact with the lamp's flame, as might have been expected. The remoteness principle is used to resolve thin skull cases. A thin skull case occurs if the plaintiff was unusually vulnerable to injury. In a literal example, suppose I am injury-prone because my skull is very thin. If you carelessly hit me on the head with a stick, are you responsible for all of my losses? What if a normal person would not have suffered any injury? What if a normal person would have suffered a minor injury, but not one as serious as mine? The law tries to strike a balance between its desire to compensate me and its desire to treat you fairly. You are not responsible at all if a normal person would not have suffered any harm. But you are fully responsible for all of my losses if it was reasonably foreseeable that a normal person would have suffered some damage. 381 For instance, if your carelessness would have bruised a normal person, I can fully recover for the fact that I also suffered brain damage. 382 Significantly for business people, the courts traditionally refused to apply a thin wallet principle. The defendant was not responsible for the fact that the plaintiff suffered to an unusual extent because the victim was poor. Today, however, the courts will hold the defendant fully liable if it was reasonably foreseeable that the plaintiff's poverty would cause it to suffer more than usual. 383 Business Decision 6.2 explores those issues.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
It seems like youre summarizing legal principles regarding foreseea... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
On January 1 , 2 0 1 9 , Cayce Corporation acquired 1 0 0 percent of Simbel Company for consideration transferred with a fair value of $ 1 2 6 , 9 0 0 . Cayce is a U . S . - based company...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Children's Hospital & Clinics COO Julie Morath set out to change the culture by instituting a policy of blameless reporting, which encourages employees to report anything that goes wrong or seems...
-
West State Furniture (WSF) manufactures desks and desk chairs using two departments within a single facility. The West Department produces the desks, and the State Department produces the chairs. WSF...
-
Repeat Problem 6-111 for flow or water at 21oC across a cylinder maintained at 32.2oC. What do you conclude from the results? Problem 6-111 Compare the results obtained from Equations (6-17), (6-21),...
-
Refer to vectors in R n (or R m ) with the standard inner product. Justify each answer. (T/F) The set of all vectors in R n orthogonal to one fixed vector is a subspace of R n .
-
The simulated countercurrent process for leaching is shown in Figure 14-6. Convert this figure to the appropriate nomenclature for washing. BI 0 Step N F A Extract Solvent 2 Load E D 1. Dump Step N +...
-
Parent and Child Corporations have filed on a consolidated basis since the mid-1970s. The group reports the following amounts for the current tax year. What is the Parent groups net operating loss...
-
Find Sum of n=o 3.2" 5 n+1
-
The strength of an item is known to be normally distributed with an unknown mean and unknown variance \({ }^{2}\). A random sample of ten items is taken and their strength measured. The strengths...
-
Enterprise X is a two-stage enterprise, Direct First Substance and Material Expense are put in both the first and second stages. Transferred from the first phase to the second phase units are worth...
-
Consider two 5-year bonds; one has a $9 %$ coupon and sells for 101.00 ; the other has a $7 %$ coupon and sells for 93.20 . Find the price of a 5-year zero-coupon bond.
-
If the spot rates for 1 and 2 years are $s_{1}=6.3 %$ and $s_{2}=6.9 %$, what is the forward rate $f_{1,2}$ ?
-
Find the convexity of a zero-coupon bond maturing at time $T$ under continuous compounding (that is, when $m ightarrow \infty$ ).
-
Sports Research International hired Demarcus Jones, an African American, for the position of social media coordinator. Revise the following sentences to reduce bias (e.g., gender, racial, ethnic,...
-
An analyst claims, It is not worth my time to develop detailed forecasts of revenue growth, profit margins, etcetera, to make earnings projections. I can be almost as accurate, at virtually no cost,...
-
Creative Financing Inc. is planning to offer a $1000 par value 16 year maturity bond with a coupon interest rate that changes every 4 years. The coupon rate for the first four years is 6.8%, 7.2% for...
-
For the following exercises, rewrite the sum as a product of two functions or the product as a sum of two functions. Give your answer in terms of sines and cosines. Then evaluate the final answer...
-
Which of the following statements are true, and which are false? (a) n = 3 only if n-2n-3=0. (b) n 2n 3 0 only if n = 3. (c) If n 2n 3 = 0 then n = 3. (d) For integers a and b, ab is a square only if...
-
(a) Find \(a_{1}\). (b) Find \(a_{2}, a_{3}, \ldots, a_{9}\). (c) Find \(a_{100}\). (d) Investigate the sequence \(a_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{n}, \ldots\) further.
-
Oleander Corporation had total assets of \($1,200,000\) on 31 December 20X3. On 31 December 20X4, total assets had increased to \($1,400,000.\) Oleanders statement of changes in equity disclosed the...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App