The following passages are taken from the notes to the financial statements in Amazon.coms 2003 annual report.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales consists of the purchase price of consumer products sold by us, inbound and outbound shipping charges to us, packaging supplies, and certain costs associated with our service revenues. In instances where we incur fulfillment costs to ship products on behalf of third-party sellers or provide customer service on their behalf, such costs are classified as Cost of sales rather than Fulfillment on the consolidated statements of operations.

Fulfillment

Fulfillment costs represent those costs incurred in operating and staffing our fulfillment and customer service centers, including costs attributable to receiving, inspecting, and warehousing inventories; picking, packaging, and preparing customer orders for shipment; credit card fees and bad debts costs, including costs associated with our guarantee for certain third-party transactions; and responding to inquiries from customers. Fulfillment costs also include amounts paid to third-parties that assist us in fulfillment and customer service operations. Certain of our fulfillment-related costs that are incurred on behalf of other business, such as Toysrus.com, Inc. and Target Corporation, are classified as cost of sales rather than fulfillment.

Required

a. What type of cost is Amazon.coms cost of sales, a product or a period cost?

b. What type of cost is Amazon.coms fulfillment cost, a product or a period cost?

c. Notice that in both passages, references are made to costs related to packaging orders for shipment. How can costs related to packaging be classified as both a cost of sales and a fulfillment cost?

d. In an article titled CreativeAccounting.com in the July 24, 2000, issue of The Wall Street Journal, Andy Kessler commented on a statement in an Amazon.com 10-K statement that resembled the passages reprinted here. He argued that these fulfillment costs sound more like a cost of sales than a fulfillment cost. Do you agree with his argument? Why or why not?