The Innocence Project is an organization that aims to revisit the cases of possibly wrongfully imprisoned individuals using DNA testing. Often, these individuals were convicted on the basis of eyewitness testimony. In your initial post to the discussion, answer the following questions:

1. Given what you know about perception, should eyewitness testimony alone ever be allowed to determine the outcome of a trial? Why or why not?
2. What factorother than accuracy of original perceptionsmight contribute to inaccuracies in testimony?
3. Should juries be instructed about the limitations of eyewitness testimony? Would this, in itself, bias the jurors?