The Lease Manager and Record Keeper Patti Nielson recently joined the Baker Property Management firm. Within her first week on the job, Patti discovered that the owner of the One-Twenty Building, a property she was to manage, insisted on using a standard lease form dated 1989. She also got a call from Henry Arrow, a tenant in the One-Twenty Building, with a request to repaint his apartment. After checking the lease form, Nielson told Arrow that the repainting every year was not the owner's responsibility. Arrow disagreed. He said, "I know what the lease says, but I made a deal with the building's former owner, Edgar Sanford, that he would provide regular painting. This came up just before we signed the lease and we did not want to redraft the lease, so Sanford just gave me a letter telling me he would take care of that." "I have an extra signed copy that I will send to you if you can't find it." After checking with the current owner of the property. Nielson learned that Arrow was correct about the side agreement. 1. Is it a good idea to agree to lease terms that are not included in the lease document? Why or why not? 2. What should Nielson do about the repainting agreement? 3. Can Nielson present the owner of the building with a convincing argument as to why they should use a more current lease form? What points would she argue? 4. If the property owner refuses to change standard forms, what types of standard clauses should Patti suggest that an attorney draft to include into the standard form