The Nofsinger consulting team presented a budget estimate to Sifers$-$Grayson management for what it would cost to have a three person incident response team on duty $24$ hours per day, $7$ days per week. The company's executives were not convinced that this level of expenditure is necessary. Which of the following is the best argument that Nofsinger could use in a follow$-$up presentation to convince Sifers$-$Grayson managers that the recommended level of staffing is necessary?

Question $26$ options:

Incident response teams expect to be paid more than other IT staff. The extra pay from shift differential is required to reduce turnover $($keep them from leaving and going to work for other companies$).$

Having a $24$ x $7$ incident response team will allow the company to reduce the number of guards required to control access to the facility.

Attacks can occur at any time of day. Rapid detection and response is necessary to ensure that business operations are restored as quickly as possible. Rapid detection and response will limit the financial and operational impacts of an attack.

Having the incident response teams on duty during the evening and midnight watches will allow the team members to complete required training and certification testing during less busy times of day.