$[$The Stolen Camera$]$ Ricardo told Natalia that Terrin stole her camera from her car. The next day, Natalia confronted Terrin and slapped him for stealing her camera. Terrin had Natalia arrested for slapping him, and the local district attorney prepared to prosecute Natalia on behalf of the state. Natalia sued Terrin for damages to the camera and for maliciously having her arrested. Terrin also sued Ricardo for defamation, claiming Ricardo lied to Natalia about Terrin stealing the camera.

Which statements are true regarding Natalia's claim against Terrin for damages involving the camera and her claim that Terrin maliciously had her arrested?

Multiple Choice

The claim for damages involving the camera and also the claim that Terrin maliciously had her arrested are civil claims involving private law.

The claim for damages involving the camera is a civil claim involving private law, but the claim that Terrin maliciously had her arrested is a civil claim involving public law.

The claim for damages involving the camera is a civil claim involving private law, but the claim that Terrin maliciously had her arrested is a criminal claim involving public law.

The claim for damages involving the camera is a civil claim involving private law, but the claim that Terrin maliciously had her arrested is a criminal claim involving private law.

The claim for damages involving the camera and also the claim that Terrin maliciously had her arrested are criminal claims involving private law.