The US Department of Justice is concerned about the negative consequences of dangerous restraint techniques being used by the police. They hire a researcher to collect a random sample of police academies and to analyze the extent the type of dangerous restraint training in their curriculums has an impact on different types of negative consequences in those police academy’s respected jurisdictions. See ANOVA table below.

Dangerous Restraint Technique Training by Type of Negative Consequences

Type of Negative Consequences	Dangerous Restraint Technique Training is:			F-Ratio	P-value (significance)
	Not Required	Covered	Stressed
Number of deaths	1200	905	603	5.05	.054
Number of lawsuits	204	155	95	8.12	.032
Number of injuries	160	80	35	12.05	.003
Number of citizen complaints	15	13	4	16.43	.001

Answer and explain the following questions (assume alpha is .05):

1. The Type of Dangerous Restraint Technique Training has a statistically significant impact on which negative consequence(s)? Explain.

2. The Type of Dangerous Restraint Technique Training does not have a statistically significant impact on which negative consequence(s)? Explain.

3. The Type of Dangerous Restraint Technique Training has its most statistically significant impact on which negative consequence? Explain.

4. Given what you have learned about the limitations of ANOVA, do you have any potential concerns about the data in the table? Hint: Look closely. If so, please name and discuss the extent of your concerns.