Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

This case concerns the death of child on July 15, 2013. That afternoon, Defendant Jesus Verduzco, a Deputy with the Pima County Sheriff's Department, was

This case concerns the death of child on July 15, 2013. That afternoon, Defendant Jesus Verduzco, a Deputy with the Pima County Sheriff's Department, was driving his PCSD vehicle on Campbell Road. He struck and killed Xavier Sanchez, while responding to a non-emergency call. Deputy Verduzco claims that Xavier darted out in front of his vehicle, and that despite swerving and applying his brakes, he was unable to avoid hitting the child. Conflicting evidence exists suggesting Deputy Verduzco may have been speeding at the time of the collision. Prior to the collision, PCSD opened six driving-related Internal Affairs files on Deputy Verduzco, on matters not related to Xavier's death. These included using excessive speed on multiple occasions and failing to utilize lights and sirens when proceeding through a red light. Each incident was related to an emergency call and Deputy Verduzco was either exonerated or found to be justified in all cases, receiving a verbal or written response only twice. (1) Is this evidence admissible under Rule 406? Why or why not? (2) How does Rule 403 impact the admissibility of this evidence, if at all?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Medical Law

Authors: Jonathan Herring

7th Edition

1292295546, 978-1292295541

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions