This is based on UK Criminal / Tort Law

Identify the given cases and where they fall under. They could fall under 3 category which are factual causation, legal causation or novus actus interveniens. Research and explain the facts / decision about the case. Each case must only fall under 1 catergory. Explain why and where does the causation or novus actus can be seen in the case.

Leeds City Council v Widdowsone (1998) EWCA Civ 1829

Hirji Mulji v Cheong Fatt Tze (1937) AC 581

Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community 2002 (Australian case)

Royal Brompton Hospital Foundation Trust v Hammond Construction (2013) EWHC 3169

*Kindly provide the reference link on where the information has bee taken from.