THIS IS THE CASE

Gadget, Inc. is a publicly-traded company with annual revenue of $250 million and a December 31 yearend. Gadget is the leading manufacturer and distributor of products intended to make life easier for society. Amelia Emerson, a CPA and the Controller of Gadget, requests advice from your accounting firm about a problem she is facing. Gadgets most popular product is the Whatchamacallit. There is not anything that this device cannot do. As a result, Gadget has experienced enormous demand for this product with unfilled back orders totaling six months. In only a short time, sales have surpassed Gadgets previously most popular product, the Super Widget. Amelias problem arose over a lawsuit brought against Gadget by Doodad & Gizmo, Inc. Doodad is a company that manufactures the Thingamabob, which is very similar to the Whatchamacallit. Doodad alleged in a federal complaint filed on February 15 of the current year in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California that Gadgets Whatchamacallit infringed on Doodads intellectual property: its patent, user interface, and style. A serious weakness in Gadgets legal defense is that the design engineer who developed the Whatchamacallit for Gadget was previously employed by Doodad when the Thingamabob was being developed. In late November, Gadgets attorney, General Counsel Lee Gill, advised Gadgets management that the case could take over a year to litigate, not including appeals. Even though the case is only in the early stages of the discovery phase, Lee Gill believes that, based on evidence collected to complete these initial discovery requests, it is likely that Gadget will ultimately have some liability. Lee Gill also estimates that a judgment for as much as $20 million could be rendered against Gadget. Lee Gill also estimates that the case could be settled out of court for $9 million, saving both parties the cost of litigation. Further, Lee Gill estimates that $9 million is likely the least amount Gadget would have to pay in damages to Doodad if the case goes to trial. In a meeting with Gadgets CEO and CFO in early December, Amelia explained that Doodads lawsuit might require an accrual in Gadgets financial statements for the current year of all or part of any estimated future judgment against Gadgets. The CEO asked Amelia what she means by the word accrual. Amelia explained that a judgment in the future against Gadget would need to be accrued and accounted for as a loss in the current year, which would reduce Gadgets net income. The CEO, growing visibly upset and hardly able to contain himself, responded by exclaiming: Are you serious? This is a lawsuit that will take years, and we might prevail regardless of what our attorney tells us. If we settle the case or even lose it, that wont happen this year. And do you have any idea what reducing our bottom line by millions of dollars this year would do to the value of our stock, not to mention the bonuses we all get, including you? Next year or the following year we could absorb this loss with the number of new projects we have in development. But not this year. Definitely not this year. The CFO offered what she thought could be a possible compromise by asking: Why not just disclose the existence of the lawsuit in Gadgets financial statements and wait to see what the outcome is later? The CEO expressed that this might work, but strongly suggested to Amelia that she needed to do more research and be absolutely 100% certain before they discussed this issue further. However, the CEO made it very clear that disclosure was the most that he would find acceptable. Amelia disagrees with both executives, but did not want to argue at the meeting until she could support her position with absolute certainty. Amelia thinks she knows how to account for the lawsuit, but wants you to provide her with your recommendation. Amelia was only recently hired as the Controller of Gadget and doesnt want to upset the CEO and CFO in case she is wrong. Even though its Amelias responsibility to decide how to account for the lawsuit, Amelia is tempted to let the CEO and CFO do what they want. However, she does not want to become involved with financial statements that violate GAAP.

THIS IS THE QUESTION

I have to advise amalia about how to account for the lawsuit. You must support your advice by citing any applicable accounting standards. And briefly talk about ethical issues from AICPA code of professional conduct for "integrity and Objectivity"

WHAT I THINK THE ANSWER IS

What I wrote was that my recommendation to Gadget is to accrue the potential loss of 9 million and disclose it in footnotes od gadgets financial statements. I believe the code is "probably loss" Contingency FASB, 2017, ASC para 450-20-25-2 because the information was available before the financial statements where issued and the amount can be reasonably estimated. "The loss should be incureed as a charge to income based on that codification. And that Gadget needs to disclose accrual and any additional estimate loss incurred during the lawsuit to clarify the companys financial statements according to FASB 450-20-50-1.

. On a side note, we as certified public accounts hold an ethical responsibility of integrity and objectivity. According to the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, the Integrity and Objectivity rule states that In the performance of any professional service, a member shall maintain objectivity and integrity, shall be free of conflicts of interest, and shall not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate his or her judgment to others. (AICPA, 2017, ET Section 1.100.001.01) Having Integrity and objectivity means to be impartial and be honest on an intellectual level as well as whole.

I just want to know if my answer is correct with the codes and what not. I tried. Thank you please let me know your expertise on this matter.