TLAW603 Written Case Analysis Jenkins v FCT (1982) 12 ATR 745 Written Case Analysis Summary Maximum Mark 25 Criteria 1 10 Clear and concise statement of the relevant facts and legal issue(s) in the case Demonstrated links to appropriate readings Criteria 2 10 Clear and concise expression of own ideas about the case using appropriate legal language that is free of error Careful organisation so that ideas develop logically through the presentation Thoughtful analysis of the judgement(s) Criteria 3 5 Appropriate use of primary and secondary legal sources Thoroughness of research and preparation as evident in the written report Management of own workload to meet presentation deadline (self assessment to self check your effective management of time to cope with university workloads and deadlines)

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Sep 02, 2024

TLAW603 Written Case Analysis:

Jenkins v FCT (1982) 12 ATR 745

Written Case Analysis

Summary	Maximum Mark: 25% Criteria 1: 10% Clear and concise statement of the relevant facts and legal issue(s) in the case Demonstrated links to appropriate readings Criteria 2: 10% Clear and concise expression of own ideas about the case using appropriate legal language that is free of error Careful organisation so that ideas develop logically through the presentation Thoughtful analysis of the judgement(s) Criteria 3: 5% Appropriate use of primary and secondary legal sources. Thoroughness of research and preparation as evident in the written report. Management of own workload to meet presentation deadline (self-assessment: to self-check your effective management of time to cope with university workloads and deadlines)

Written Case Analysis

Summary

Maximum Mark: 25%

Criteria 1: 10%

Clear and concise statement of the relevant facts and legal issue(s) in the case
Demonstrated links to appropriate readings

Criteria 2: 10%

Clear and concise expression of own ideas about the case using appropriate legal language that is free of error
Careful organisation so that ideas develop logically through the presentation
Thoughtful analysis of the judgement(s)

Criteria 3: 5%

Appropriate use of primary and secondary legal sources.
Thoroughness of research and preparation as evident in the written report.
Management of own workload to meet presentation deadline (self-assessment: to self-check your effective management of time to cope with university workloads and deadlines)