To what extent is the quote $$locating an expert to testify for the plaintiff in a malpractice action is known to be very difficult task, mainly because in most cases one doctor is reluctant and unwilling to testify against another doctor. Although doctors may complain privately to each other about the incompetence of other doctors, they are extremely reluctant to air the matter publicly.$$ from the $1975$ Ohio case, Faulkner v$.$ Pezeshki, still apt? Do medical malpractice attorneys in your area still run into reluctance of one expert $($physician$)$ to testify against another? Please explain, and if so$,$ what can be done about the reluctance to testify?