Today we have to say thou shalt not to an economy of exclusion and inequity. Such an economy kills. How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points? Today everything comes under the laws of competition and the survival of the fittest. Economic theories assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and nave trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system. Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting.

If a judge wrote an opinion that relied on this passage to support the judges decision, what school or schools of jurisprudence would be represented? Why?