Question
TORTS In Stuart v Kirkland-Veenstra [2009] HCA 15, the High Court considered the duty of care owed by the police to an individual to prevent
TORTS
In Stuart v Kirkland-Veenstra [2009] HCA 15, the High Court considered the duty of care owed by the police to an individual to prevent his suicide. The Court unanimously found no duty of care in the circumstances of that case. However, that decision did not foreclose the possibility of tortious liability of police in other circumstances.
Smith v State of Victoria [2018] VSC 475 was an application to dismiss a negligence claim by a woman alleging the police had repeatedly failed to protect her from violence perpetrated by her ex-partner. The Court refused to strike out the claim.
critically analyses the question of whether tort law should impose a duty of care on police to protect victims of domestic violence from harm.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started