Question
Using the data for 3M provided in the last question, Compute the HPR for each one of the five sub-periods presented in the table. Compute
Using the data for 3M provided in the last question,
Compute the HPR for each one of the five sub-periods presented in the table.
Compute the Total Return for 2015 by compounding the five HPR estimates in a) back to back. How does your estimate compare to the one you obtained in Question 8b above? Why?
Answer a) | ||||||
HPR = Dividend + Appreciation in stock/Initial Investment | ||||||
Dividend | Amount | |||||
Q1 | 1.025 | |||||
Q2 | 1.025 | |||||
Q3 | 1.025 | |||||
Q4 | 1.025 | |||||
Total | 4.100 | |||||
Appreciation in stock (Closing Price) | ||||||
Price at beginning | 164.06 | |||||
Price at ending | 150.64 | |||||
Appreciation | (13.42) | |||||
HPR = 4.10+(13.42)/164.06 | ||||||
HPR = -5.68% | ||||||
Answer b) | ||||||
HPR = Dividend + Appreciation in stock/Initial Investment | ||||||
Dividend | Amount | |||||
Q1 | 1.025 | |||||
Q2 | 1.025 | |||||
Q3 | 1.025 | |||||
Q4 | 1.025 | |||||
Total | 4.100 | |||||
Appreciation in stock (Adj Closing Price) | ||||||
Price at beginning | 157.66 | |||||
Price at ending | 148.57 | |||||
Appreciation | (9.09) | |||||
HPR = 4.10+(9.09)/157.66 | ||||||
HPR = -3.17% | ||||||
Answer c) | Yes, Our estimates differ. Because Share price did not | |||||
fall, As we expect. Therefore HPR improved. | ||||||
|
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started