Question
Vitural Pty Ltd is a company in a tyre wholesale business. The Binz family hold all shares of company. Vinh Binz and his wife working
Vitural Pty Ltd is a company in a tyre wholesale business. The Binz family hold all shares of company. Vinh Binz and his wife working in company as director.
The company meet up some trouble because the competitor, however the broad of director kept to allowing for purchase more tyres to the store.
Moreover, some orders could not paid on due. At the time when the company was in a financially precarious position, the company granted a 5 year lease of the premises it owned at a fixed rent substantially below current market value to two of its directors.
The lease contract included an option in favour of the tenants (directors) to buy the premises again at a fixed price substantially lower than the market value. The granting of the lease together with the option was authorised at a general meeting of the shareholders of the company.
1 year later, the company went into liquidation.
My question is
The creditors would like to take some solution for this problem
Moreover, Vinh and his wife has a breach of director duties? which rules or case study can be support for it
What are the implications for the director?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started