We are studying a factum and are exploring the Toulmin model; Claim, Ground, Warrant.

My issue is with identifying a warrant.

My claim is: When viewed objectively, the Flyers do not violate section 14(1)b of the Code

My ground is: Whatcott's comments in relation to the flyers were about sexual behaviour; the Court of Queen's bench misinterpreted Whatcott's intentions when commenting on sexuality

So for for my warrant I have: courts sometimes misinterpret people's meanings

I am not sure if the warrant is correct, hopefully someone can give me some insight on the Toulmin model

Thanks!