What do you think about the principle of Psychological Safety providing a "get out of jail free card" for expressing any ideas whatsoever? Please comment on James Damore's firing being consistent, or not, with Google's policy of embracing Psychological Safety? In the context of this discussion, how might we understand and apply the (constructivist) dictum that one must consider "what makes a person's truth true for them?" Think about whether Damore could have reasonably anticipated Google's actions? Is it possible that he might have anticipated Google's actions and decided to become a "martyr?" If so, why might he have chosen this course of action