What is a Summary of the interview.

Reference: files attached.

Pavel Kozlov BCJ 4303 Phone Interview Prof. Amy S Vanderford 03/23/2024 On March 23, 2024, Oxnard PD Detective Snakenborg was interviewed by Pavel Kozlov by phone. Detective Snakenborg did give his contact information. Phone number: (805)-385-7600. He was advised of the purpose of the interview and provided the following information. Background Information Detective Snakenborg started working with the Oxnard Police Department fresh out of high school as a cadet. He completed Academy at the age of 21. He states that he has done several interviews with people for different crimes committed and traffic accidents to see who was in the right and who was in the wrong. However, he stated that his most common interviews are those of criminal and murderous investigations. Typical Interview Type He expressed that most of his interviews are done with persons connected with crime or murder or who have seen crime or murder. He expressed that an essential part of any interview is the capacity of investigators to get exact and solid data from victims, witnesses, and the suspects or any interviewee. The screening is a fundamental piece of the data gathering methodology for any interview. Purpose of Typical Interview He expressed that the general point of a interviewing with an injured person, witness, or suspect is to obtain precise and solid accounts about issues, which can stand the trial of preliminary. He expressed that the primary role of his meeting is to gain precise, dependable, and essential information. It is not to affirm that the official's thought process could have occurred, nor to pressure the suspect to give data or admit it. Preparation for Interview He stated that planning and preparation are important components of an interview; without them, an interview may end before it even begins. Planning is the process of becoming mentally and firmly ready for a meeting. In addition, readiness includes the things that need to be ready prior to the meeting, such as the location, the atmosphere, and any technical or administrative matters. Overworked and busy authorities have said that they don't have time to plan and prepare. Officials have noticed that by properly preparing before speaking, they save time after analytical discussing. Important planning, when included in an expert conference, also lessens the likelihood of cases being indicted only to have the court dismiss them for lack of sufficient evidence or specifics. Location of Interview He stated that interviews are typically done at the police headquarters or on a crime scene, so they are always done face-to-face. He stated that most of his interviews were done at police headquarters. He stated that he conducts interviews exactly where the accident occurred to get the names and phone numbers of those who witnessed what happened. He also stated that he had to travel to the hospital to check on victims of crimes and get their statements. Who is Typically Present He expressed that usually, in a meeting, he and another investigator and the individual are being addressed. He likewise expressed that assuming the suspect or witness is underage, and they have a parent or lawful gatekeeper there. He additionally expressed that occasionally there is a lawyer present. He also expressed that different official could be present, assuming they are managing a furious suspect or witness. Interview Opening He expressed that meeting a potential suspect is the main stage and the most minimal degree of connection. The individual is not even determinable as a suspect now. As a witness, the board thinks frequently reports criminal occasions while acting like observers or even survivors of the wrongdoing. The agent getting an assertion report from such an individual might become dubious that they are not being honest; in any case, until those doubts are affirmed by proof that meets the trial of shaping sensible reason for conviction. Interview Techniques He expressed that he does not have methods because each circumstance is unique. He said he generally introduces himself. He expressed that he reads them Miranda rights once more. He expressed that he utilized the Behavior Analysis Interview (BAI) as a non- accusatory round table discussion. He expressed first asks foundation questions to lay out private facts about the suspect, and that permits him an opportunity to assess the suspect's typical verbal and nonverbal way of behaving. Then he asks to conduct inciting inquiries planned to induce different verbal and nonverbal reactions from honest and tricky suspects. Recording the Interview He stated that he documents every interview. He claimed that he notes every one of them as they are occasionally and frequently utilized in court. In order to ensure that agreement to speak with the police without legal representation after a crime has been committed is not withheld, he said that he records them as well when legal counsel is not present. Closing the Interview He stated that at the end of the interview, you should always provide the interviewee with accurate information about the next steps in the process. For example, you could advise suspects about possible pre-liminary confinement, inform witnesses about whether or not they need to appear in court, and so on. If the correspondence has been frightening, this practically has no real impact. Overcoming Resistance He stated that in cases where there is reason for suspicion, witnesses and suspects would almost certainly oppose you and use force against you. He stated that an essential part of the evidence gathered for any inquiry is the details of incidents provided by witnesses. A witness statement is an oral account of events or facts about the circumstances surrounding the crime. Detecting and Responding to Deception He claimed that he pays attention to everything, even nonverbal cues. He stated that he pays close attention to any little detail that alters the tale when questioning the suspect or the witness who identified the culprit. He provided me some tips, such as the suspect turning to one side and upward, pressing his lips together, tensing his eyelids, and lowering his eyebrows as he prepares to respond. Although he said the suspect lacked objectivity, he expressed reluctance to attend the meeting because of the suspect's apparent dishonesty. Conclusion He discussed the various stages and examined the issues encompassing the investigative interviews of talking, addressing, and questioning suspects in criminal examinations. He stated that great interviewers are quiet, amicable, and attentive and can respond well to circumstances that make others alarm. He also stated that criminal investigators should have great direction and derivation abilities