What is the best explanation of earth jurisprudence?

a$.)$

It is the idea that nature should be treated as a "person" with legal rights, in order to protect it$.$

b$.)$

It is pollution, such as carbon pollution, that is thought to be invisible.

c$.)$

It is the idea that natural resources are depleted, and the long$-$term impact is not considered.

d$.)$

It is a levy against a business for engaging in non$-$environmentally friendly activities.