1. What is the dominant way of thinking about discrimination in the law? Why is this problematic?
2. How does the dominant way of thinking get transferred into feminist theory and/or anti-racist politics?
3. What examples does Crenshaw use to illustrate her argument about the inevitable issues that arise when we fail to apply an intersectional framework in our analyses of discrimination?

Crenshaw, Mapping the Margins - Pages 1-44 answer with evidence from the article