What is the rule of LEstrange v Graucob? Which of the following is correct? Under LEstrange v Graucob a signed contract is binding unless a party can demonstrate that they did not read it Under LEstrange v Graucob the courts determined that even if a contract is signed, this does not mean a party is bound by what turns out to be unreasonable terms The presumption of LEstrange v Graucob is that where the parties have signed a contract, they are presumed to have read and agreed with its contents Under LEstrange v Graucob principle, signing a contract means that a party has agreed to the terms of the contract, as long as they are not