Which of the following is the justification given for the court upholding the trial court's decision in H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.? Question 1 options: a) The three year statute of limitations for tort claims bars Taylor's suit. b) There was an express contract between the parties that triggered the 4 year statute of limitations for contract actions. c) There was an implied contract between the parties that triggered the 4 year statute of limitations for contract actions. d) Since Coca Cola did not intentionally keep the missing cylinders, no tort was committed