Which of the following statements best describes the courts ruling in In re Polemis?Question $1$ options:a$)$ The Plaintiff was not entitled to recover damages from the Defendant since the Defendants negligence was not the proximate cause of the fire.b$)$ The Plaintiff was entitled to recover for damages from the Defendants since any reasonable person would foresee that Defendants act in negligently unloading the benzine would cause damage.c$)$ The Plaintiff was not entitled to recover for damages from the Defendants since the Defendants exercised due caution in discharging the cargo from the Plaintiffs vessel.d$)$ The Plaintiff was entitled to recover for damages from the Defendants since the Defendants did not have an agreement to discharge the benzene and petrol from the Plaintiffs vessel.