1. Why did Sweta Mangal (CEO) refuse to pay a government official to release payment for the ambulance services ZHL provides?Why did the new employee disagree with this stance? What legal and ethical dilemmas are faced here?
2. When does a gift become a bribe? Is inviting the officials to dinner bribery? Is giving them a new iPhone bribery? Why or why not?
3. If you were the CEO of ZHL, what would you do?Would your answer be different if ZHL were a local Australian company rather than a Indian company? Explain why or why not with reference to the concept of ethical relativism.
4. Refer to the Moriaty reading.Express the central ethical issue as a "Should . . " questionand briefly describe the arguments on both sides of the case. How might this apply to the Wells Fargo case you discussed last week?
5. Briefly contrast how this question would be approached from a moral relativist as opposed to a universalist perspective. Is Moriaty a moral relativist, and is his answerjust a matter of opinion?

CASE STUDY: "Ziqitza health care ltd: responding to corruption.

Moriarty, J. (2005), "Do CEOs Get Paid Too Much?",Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 257-281.